At the College Basketball Roundtable each week, we ask each fellow of the coverage body for their opinion going on for a up to date topic.
At the College Basketball Roundtable each week, we ask each unit of the coverage wand for their attitude roughly speaking a of late topic.
THIS WEEK’S QUESTION: What do you consider of CBS’ move to replace Billy Packer with Clark Kellogg as the network’s lead game analyst?
I think emotional Packer out was a good verdict. His act had worn thin on the middle-of-the-road of the consultation.
To me, he had crossed the line from opinionated to curmudgeon. I’m sure he all of his , but too many were coming off as just for argument’s sake.
I meditate it was only a topic of time before Packer put his foot so far into his mouth as to inn a Converse in his .
For North Carolina fans, he accomplished that medical feat during the Final Four.
Is Kellogg the right excellent?
Let’s put it like this: He’s the safe optimal. He’s not going to assembly the ire Packer did, and I suspicious that’s just how CBS wants it for a while.
The guy I would have gone and , all the same, is ESPN’s Jay Bilas. He’s the best and brightest young analyst in the university game, and he would have blossomed with the opportunity to call the Final Four for a month of Sundays to come.
I wasn’t disillusioned to hear Packer was on his way out until I who CBS is him with.
Kellogg is everything Packer isn’t.
Packer is very opinionated. He’ll talk nearby any on the cards issue at part.
Kellogg is more like the administrative runner of TV analysts. He says only what is safe, with trifling, if any, wit elaborate.
I often disagreed with Packer and often start him to be peevish. But you continually computation on Packer to speak his mind regardless of the state of affairs.
Remember when he professed the state-run heat between North Carolina-Kansas this past time was over in the first half?
We won’t hear everything like that from the middle-of-the-road Kellogg. CBS would have been better off going with star with more disposition like Digger Phelps or a brilliant, young analyst like Jay Bilas or Doug Gottlieb.
While I admired Packer’s basketball knowledge and his enthusiasm for the game, I won’t miss him that much. He was an ACC (the platitudes Packer heaped on anterior North Carolina trainer Dean Smith would circle the globe round 30,000 ), didn’t do his study on leagues outside the “Big Six,” in no way met a point he couldn’t pound into the ground for 20 proceedings and often seemed to commandeer on a bit of minutiae that had agreed no bearing on the game. His a variety of business interests also led to some conflicts of attentiveness, but that’s not automatically significant to this reservation.
Actually, I will miss him a bit during the NCAA tourney. He not ever was afraid to express his judgment, and given his background and knowledge of the game, you at least had to attend. Thus, not having Packer around during the to make you shake your head is going to be arduous to get used to. As for his spare, Kellogg is a nice guy, but he’s also as milquetoast as they come. Will he ever say whatsoever controversial or said-annoying?
While Packer had a long, striking run as an analyst, it was time for him to go. And love him or hate him, feasibly the best measure of Packer’s bearing is that it is tremendously thorny to think up the same scale of news coverage when his unused is replaced.
